Want to find out about D2L's usability? Click the hyperlink! Desire 2 Learn
(You WILL have to download the presentation to hear the audio, and it has to be on a Mac (I don't know why (Sorry))). After you have download the presentation (you need PowerPoint), click "slideshow" and then "view from start" to experience the presentation properly.
This blog is for truth-seekers, who seek not truth but understanding. For those who seek understanding, they must first find chaos. Those who seek chaos must first immerse themselves in sanity. After living in sanity long enough, insanity will be achieved, and we'll find our understanding in a lovely padded room together.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Monday, November 4, 2013
The Female Stereotype and Oprah!!!
I have to say that I am a little confused about the reading
choices for this week. I would expect to find these two pieces of writing in a
class about women and gender studies (a minor I will be officially pursuing
next semester). I feel that Jamieson was talking about 19th and 20th
century women; I feel that her analysis falls short for the 21st
century reinvention of the “new woman.” I have met many women that not only
engaged in open debate but they did so with much more competition than men. Her
description reminded me of the quiet housewife who only whispered her stance as
to not be bothersome. I did not understand much of this with the overarching
theme of our class; however, I did enjoy the line that housewives were invariably
the “storytellers” of the household. This skill effectively locked in their indispensable
use in television.
The womanly role in television is a fascinating subject that
has helped continue the stereotype. However, this role of the storyteller has
evolved into just that: the woman’s story being told. Paradoxically, this has
helped to reverse the stereotypes in certain ways and was likely an integral
step in boosting women towards equality. In a strange way, the role of women in
television has split into multiple uses. On the one hand, women are still
exploited through television (via ads or shows/movies that use stereotypical
roles). The scantily clad woman slowly reaches into a cooler full of beer; her voluptuous
breasts are nearly popping out of her bikini as she firmly grasps the shaft/neck
of a bottle of beer. She pulls it out of the ice bent over at an exact 90
degree angle as sweat glistens off of her perfectly smooth skin. I believe you
are getting the picture; the Sexualization of the female body draws the
attention of a male audience. Wysocki talks about the sexualzation of women in
ads, but only a printed one out of a magazine. In this context, we lose the
action that the woman enacts in a picture; however, we are allowed to “fill in”
the situation (pursuant to McCloud’s ideas about comic book frames involving
faces and situations being filled in by the individual). So it seems that
watching the action unfold is purely physical stimulation; inversely, seeing an
individual picture staged in the middle of a scene requests that the observer
fills in the rest of the scenario using themselves.
Women have also used television to positively influence
their outlook and reinforced their capabilities within our culture. Oprah is a
great representation of the positive female movement on television. Not only is
she extremely successful and rich, she has placed herself in an infallible position
for women to emulate (power, success, and strength). This link will show a
little parody about Oprah that admits her strength while exposing a male
invented weakness. Warning! There is nudity and swearing, so enjoy!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)