Wolf’s points on not being able to see outside the lens of
cameras and the correlation of simulations versus real time/life develop a few
questions and some interesting insights. Wolf talks about the simulations
(training for real-world situations) and their possible disconnect with reality;
the first thing that came to mind was drone pilots. The simulation for a drone
pilot is almost exactly the same as the actual act of flying a drone. The drone
displays live streaming video to the pilot, half-way around the world, flying
it. The experience then becomes a synchronized act. Pilots develop the muscle-memory
necessary to pilot these expensive machines through simulation alone. However,
the stress of knowing you are flying a real drone with a hefty price tag can affect
the pilot’s performance; this stress cannot be recreated in a simulation.
Recently there have been other claims of stress that effect
drone operators. Some have talked about the indifference the job enforces on
them. The missile strike on a target appears to feel like a video game. This “feel”
is easy for the public to digest but it left a sour taste in some of the pilot’s
mouths. They did not know who they were killing, but they knew it was a real
life human being. The transmission of the video to the pilot does not take away
from its real world implications. So Wolf’s claim that simulations can’t
recreate real world situations is both true and false. In many ways it can
create the experience and the necessary muscle-memory to successful operate in
real-time; a simulator, on the other hand cannot yet fully recreate the
stresses associated with the real world. I believe that this experience may one
day be harnessed to its full potential, though.
Another interesting faucet is the loss of the peripheral
when using a camera lens. The “big picture” may not always be realized by those
viewing the square piece of the puzzle. Paradoxically, a drone is perceived to “see
all,” but in reality is grounded by the same principle as my camera phone—we
can’t see everywhere at once. This can play a rather grim role in the drone
pilots’ distaste for the feel of indiscriminant killing. What if these people
are innocent bystanders mistaken for threats in a gun battle? The drone
operators are not always capable of choosing targets, sometimes they are given
targets. Their peripheral picture can be lost and reduced to a square viewing
of a target.
On a lighter note, Mishra’s speak about graphic
interpretations and Wolf’s talk of plane instruments brought me once again back
to drone pilots. The instruments represent certain mathematics and wind
dynamics that the user doesn’t have to have P.H.D. level knowledge on to
understand how to read it. Of course, there is a learning curve to know how to
read it as Mishra talks about. Once the basic knowledge has been obtained to
operate it, the user need not bother with the sciences behind the technology.
I think the whole concept is interesting as well. On one hand, I think that anyone in that position would have to have a sense of disconnect anyway. Imaging dropping bombs on what you know to be thousands of innocent people. You'd have to be disconnect from that situation, I would think, even if you were actually flying the plane. However, it does bring up the interesting question of how far is too far. I know that I don't like where technology like this is going and it's implications on society and humanity, but I don't know quite what we should do about it. I guess the best thing is to spread awareness and question things before we accept them. It's moving so quickly, though, my cynical side wants to say there's no stopping it.
ReplyDeleteI recently read an article on a drone pilot who was permanently damaged by all the death he caused with the job - I disagree with Mishra on that field too. Simulations can be entirely effective, though at the moment I'm having a hard time thinking of another example other than drones. I don't know that there's ever a way to disconnect from something like that - unless you start getting machines running machines involved. And that's just too creepy for me to think about.
ReplyDelete