Thursday, March 20, 2014

Invisible Genitalia: A Look Beneath the Suit and Skirt


The mainstream porn industry relies on a rigid set of constraints. In “Calling the Shots” Tristan Taormino identifies these as “men and women as one-dimensional objects—where men are sexual robots and women are vehicles for their pleasure” (261). The arrangement takes advantage of presupposed social constructions such as: men are dominant and women are submissive; men receive the gratification while women give it; and finally—men have a penis and women have a vagina. This can be referred to as the dyadic imaginary of genitalia. In the “Dyadic Imaginary” by Danielle Hidalgo et al, the dyadic imaginary is “an ideology or hegemonic concept that renders non-dyadic intimate and sexual relationship forms invisible and unnatural” (173). In the same way “non-dyadic” sexual relationships are considered “unnatural” so too are non-dyadic genitalia in that the dyadic imaginary of genitalia renders the possibility of a man having a vagina or a women having a penis invisible. Therefore, when society views both men and women clothed, they are projected with dyadic genitalia regardless of his or her true genitalia.
If a person with non-dyadic genitalia is viewed in the nude, the individual is labeled as “unnatural.” In Sherilyn Connelly’s piece “The Big Reveal” Connelly details a scene from a 1984 “straight” porn entitled L’Amour in which two straight males (Harry and Jaime) are engaging in the mainstream porn template by receiving sexual gratification from two women—Ivory and Racheal. As the scene unfolds, “Jaime and Racheal fuck as Ivory continues to blow Harry… [then] Ivory stands in front of Harry, lifts her skirt to reveal a Dirk Diggler-esque penis” (76). Up until the actual reveal of Ivory’s genitalia, the viewer of the porno as well as the male actors attach a vagina to Ivory. Even through the textual representation of the pornography, Ivory’s genitalia is projected as dyadic because she is referred to as a “she”; thus, the reader automatically applies the dyad to her genitalia establishing her non-dyadic genitalia as invisible. However, as stated above, once the non-dyadic genitalia is actually exposed, the individual is met with revulsion and treated as unnatural. Connelly reveals this reaction after Ivory shows her penis to Harry when “He and Jaime then rush out of the room, their pants literally around their ankles but their heteromasculinity intact” (76). The two men’s reaction occurs when the dyadic imaginary of genitalia is suddenly reversed. Surprisingly, as Connelly points out, Harry’s heteromasculinity stays “intact.” But how can this be true?
Upon identifying Ivory’s true genitalia, the dyadic imaginary of genitalia applies the male identity to Ivory to keep the dyad itself intact; therefore, Ivory is no longer a woman but a man because his genitalia says so. However, at the time of Harry’s oral sex with Ivory, the dyad had clearly identified Ivory as having a vagina, and thus, Harry’s heteromasculinity is safe because his sex act functioned with a woman and her dyadic imaginary of genitals. Conversely, if Harry engages in sex acts with Ivory once the dyad has assigned her with the male gender, Harry’s heterosexuality would then become homosexuality.
Pornography that operates outside of the mainstream constraints can become an effective tool for deconstructing the dyadic imaginary of genitalia; however, to accomplish this task, individuals with non-dyadic genitalia would have to display their genitalia from the very first scene. At the same time, the individual must maintain a strong genderqueer image. For example, if a women—who has a penis—displays her non-dyadic genitalia, but still advertises male physical features, the dyad will attach a male gender to the woman. However, a man who has a vagina and displays a strong representation of the male gender, while exposing his non-dyadic genitalia from the very beginning, will shatter the dyad through queered gender and queered genitalia. The combined queered image leaves no room for the dyadic imaginary of genitalia to operate within; thus, the dyad is deconstructed.

No comments:

Post a Comment